Twisha Sharma Case: CBI Files Chargesheet Against Former Judge Giribala Singh and Son
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has submitted a chargesheet against former Bhopal judge Giribala Singh and her son, advocate Samarth Singh, accusing them of abetment of suicide, mental cruelty, and dowry harassment in connection with the death of former model Twisha Sharma.
What Happened
Twisha Sharma, a 34-year-old MBA graduate and former model, was found dead under suspicious circumstances at her marital residence in the Katara Hills area of Bhopal on May 12. Her death occurred roughly five months after her marriage to Samarth Singh on December 9, 2025. Twisha’s family subsequently accused her husband and mother-in-law of physical abuse, ongoing mental harassment, and demands for dowry.
Following allegations by Sharma’s family regarding institutional bias by the Bhopal Police, the investigation was transferred to the CBI. The agency filed an over 650-page chargesheet before the special court of Judge Shobhana Bhalavi in Bhopal. Both accused are currently in judicial custody and lodged in a Bhopal jail.
According to the chargesheet, Twisha was continuously subjected to mental cruelty after refusing to move investments worth approximately ₹20 lakh into a joint account with her husband. The CBI noted that she faced further harassment and taunts following the loss of her job, and had informed her parents that she felt under constant surveillance by both accused at her marital home. The agency stated that Giribala Singh instigated her son with common intent, while Samarth Singh engaged in character assassination and used derogatory language regarding her past relationships, leaving her with no choice but to end her life.
Key Highlights
- The CBI filed charges under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Sections 80(2), 85, 108, and 3(5), alongside Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
- The chargesheet spans over 650 pages and details alleged continuous mental cruelty, surveillance, and dowry demands.
- The Madhya Pradesh High Court previously directed a second autopsy by an AIIMS Delhi medical board following objections to the initial post-mortem conducted at AIIMS Bhopal.
- Twisha’s family’s legal counsel highlighted stark contradictions between the two medical reports regarding six injuries on the body.
Why This Matters
The case involves severe allegations of domestic harassment and dowry demands against a former judicial officer and an advocate. It also underscores procedural complexities in criminal investigations, as highlighted by the transfer of the case from local police to the CBI and the sharp differences between post-mortem findings from two premier medical institutions. While AIIMS Bhopal recorded six ante-mortem injuries, AIIMS Delhi classified them as post-mortem marks likely sustained during transport to the hospital.
What to Watch Next
The CBI has requested additional time from the court to complete investigations into three specific areas: witness testimony regarding dowry demands, potential tampering with the digital video recorder (DVR) of CCTV cameras at the residence, and data extraction from Twisha’s mobile phone. Additionally, counsel for the victim’s family stated they will review the chargesheet and the AIIMS Delhi autopsy findings before deciding whether to file a protest petition.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who are the accused in the Twisha Sharma case?
The CBI has charged former judge Giribala Singh and her son, advocate Samarth Singh, who was married to Twisha Sharma.
What specific charges have been filed?
The CBI has invoked BNS Sections 80(2), 85, 108, and 3(5) covering cruelty, abetment of suicide, and common intention, along with Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
Why was a second autopsy conducted?
The Madhya Pradesh High Court ordered a second post-mortem by a medical board at AIIMS Delhi after Twisha Sharma’s family raised objections to the original examination conducted at AIIMS Bhopal.
Source: Reported by The Hindu.