Consequences of cheap electricity | Expert Views

 A sea change in energy prices is dismantling this old worldview. For the first time, India is emerging as a favourable location for energy costs. Recent research by Nikit Abhyankar and Amol Phadke at the University of California Berkeley (https://bit.ly/ieccucb) brings remarkable facts to light. The capital expenditure required for a solar plant in India is now approximately one-third that in the United States (US). This difference stems from three factors: Interconnection delays, labour costs, and land acquisition. India suffers a penalty on the cost of capital, reflecting the failures of financial economic policy, including capital controls. Overall, the advantages in physical execution outweigh the financial penalty.

 Consider solar electricity delivered during daylight hours. In India, this stands at $30 per megawatt-hour (Mwh) whereas the US price is closer to $50 per Mwh. For firm power, where solar is bundled with battery storage to provide round-the-clock energy, this is $70 per Mwh in India compared to $100 per Mwh in the US.

 The US was the original fossil-fuel hegemon. It built its economic supremacy upon the combustion of wood, coal, oil, and gas. Research funding by the US government made the renewables revolution. The traditional view held that competing with the US on energy costs was impossible. But the emerging Indian electrostate is now delivering a powerful new Indian macro-fundamental. There are, of course, countries that beat India on energy costs. But surpassing the US is a big thing. Now, producing in India has two distinct advantages over the US: Cheap labour and cheap energy.

 The emerging Indian electrostate calls for a rethink of strategy in private firms. The current structure of Indian industry is based on compensating for expensive energy. The trade liberalisation of 1991-2007 forced firms to find competitive niches. Because energy was expensive, Indian firms favoured business areas that had low energy-intensity. We see this in the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) database (https://bit.ly/3WieMrA). In 1992-93, power-fuel-water for non-financial firms was 5.73 per cent of expenses. In 2024-25, this had dropped to just 2.87 per cent. But green power now reshapes the frontier of what can be profitably done in India.

 Consider the steel industry. Almost all existing steel capacity relies on coal as the primary raw material and energy source. The technological alternative is the production of green steel. This involves using electricity to produce hydrogen, running a direct reduced iron (DRI) shaft furnace to create sponge iron, and melting this iron into steel using an electric arc furnace (EAF).

 This technological dislocation presents a unique opportunity for the Indian steel industry. In China, the industrial base is dominated by a billion tonnes/annum fossil-fuel steel capacity. India has the opportunity to build green-steel capacity that can beat this industry. There is a scenario where the billion tonnes/annum Chinese industry becomes a stranded legacy asset, and the Chinese non-market economy will struggle with its bankruptcy. Making aluminium requires electricity and not coal as raw material. As with steel, we get to estimates for green aluminium that are competitive against coal-based production, with an edge when exporting into CBAM countries, once we take into account contemporary prices for green power in India and the locked-in nominal prices for 25 years.

 We are at a tipping point in 2026, when these calculations have reached rough parity. From here, the dominance of green technologies will go up through three certainties and two pieces of optimism about India: (a) More countries will adopt the CBAM; (b) progress on solar energy and batteries will continue, and the cost of green power will keep dropping; (c) coal prices will go up with inflation; (d) if Indian macro/finance policy reforms make progress, capital controls will be removed, which will reduce the cost of capital, and then the cost of green power will go down; (e) if the Indian state takes global warming and air quality more seriously, taxes and other restrictions on coal will come.

 Boardrooms and investment committees must now rethink strategy in many respects. There are novel investment opportunities in energy-intensive industries in the Indian electrostate. The tail risk of stranded fossil-fuel assets in areas such as electricity, steel and aluminium has gone up. There is a lot at stake. According to the CMIE CapEx database, projects under implementation for primary steel total ₹6.4 trillion, representing roughly 149 million tonnes per annum of capacity. For primary aluminium, projects under implementation total ₹2.6 trillion, representing about 5.8 million tonnes per annum. A good chunk of the aluminium projects is a ₹0.8 trillion bet on new coal-power plants, which is odd by global standards. What is needed in this field is not practitioner knowledge about how the business worked in the last decade but a strategic sense about how the world will change in the next decade. 

The writer is a researcher at XKDR Forum